Production Matters I - Mindset Transformation
by C. Andrew Dunning
Part 1 of 3 - Originally published in the September 2006 issue of Church Production Magazine.
Click HERE for Part 2 (Immersion and Unity) or HERE for Part 3 (Risk Taking and Communication).
Have you ever had your mindset unexpectedly transformed? I have. It is humbling. It is scary. In the end, though, it can result in incredible joy. Transformation has been (and, continues to be) the story of my life in recent years.
For several years I have had the privilege of creating the lighting for
many of the top names in Christian music, as well as for numerous conferences
and special events throughout the country. Though I have also had several
very satisfying projects in and for churches, I was guilty of being pretty
cynical when it came to the quality of church production. Now, I find myself
really enjoying working in churches - and not with cynicism, but with the
knowledge of being immersed in excellence.
My transformation started when Mike Walker, technical director at Fellowship
Church in Grapevine, Texas invited me to join the production team at his
church for the opening of a new sermon series a couple of years ago. I accepted
his invitation with more than a little skepticism. In my first days there,
I was very pleasantly surprised. Contrary to my expectations, what I found
was a production team as committed to providing as high (if not higher)
a level of production for weekly services as my colleagues and I have been
pursuing for tours and other projects. Through this team's creative implementation
of staging, lighting, audio, and video, I was shown what some of you already
knew - that excellence can exist in the church realm. Equally impressive
is that they, and many of you, are implementing world-class production on
a weekly basis to enhance the eternal message - without watering it down.
Starting with this article, I will be sharing with you some things I frequently
explore with Fellowship and with other churches. Some are things I've learned
from years of being around the stage. A few are things I've learned by paying
a lot of "stupid tax." Many are things I've had the pleasure of
learning from some of you.
My intent is not to create clones of other churches, but to give you an
idea of the mind-set behind the "hows and whys" various production
techniques, and to challenge you with some of the philosophy behind others'
approaches. Therefore, as you read this, try to embrace the philosophy -
not the particular implementation.
Though not openly states, when it comes to production, many churches have the attitude of "It's okay if it isn't good. We're a church, people will understand." That mindset seemed to me to go against the message that was being shared from pulpits. Walker puts it very well: "We have the opportunity each and every week to tell the greatest story ever told. Why can't the presentation come up to the level of the story we are telling?"
Although every church is unique, four concepts tend to rise to the top when
wrestling with the role of the production arts in the church:
Style and Budget
The first concept in this list is a good starting point for this look at mindset transformation. Budget and service/worship style are two of the biggest perceived hurdles for churches trying new and different things. Both have a huge impact on their attitude of excellence in production.
Let me say one thing before I go on: I am not at all trying to oversimplify
what I know are often very intricate and fairly difficult issues that face
many churches, or to criticize you or your church as you struggle with them.
My goal is to encourage the huge amount of currently unrealized potential
that is in many churches today.
The Budget Misperception
Let's look at the first misperception that is often found in churches: "We
don't have the budget to do any interesting production. Now, if we had the
budget that 'Mega Church of the Anointed' has, then we could do some cool
things."
Sound familiar? The problem is that a lot of people simply stop there. Lacking
a big budget, they don't even try. Here's a suggestion: Stop worrying about
equipment. Don't get all hung up on particular gear or on what you don't
have. Look instead at the resources you do have.
For example, let's say you visit "First Contemporary Church of the
Amplified" that has 100 moving lights, and you see a look or an effect
that you like. Don't just go back to your pastor and say that you need moving
lights. Go back and ask yourself "With the resources at hand, how can
I create a similar result, and if I can't, what's going to be the approach
that makes the most sense?"
One church I visited recently has a nice facility with a good selection
of "conventional" fixtures (PARs and ellipsoidals). All of the
production duties are handled year-round by a small team of dedicated volunteers.
The main worship room has walls that beg to be brought to life - lit with
texture and color. Each year at Christmas time, I consult with them to do
just that, with rented intelligent fixtures. On my last visit, the worship
pastor and I spent some time together in the room, sharing vision about
bringing the room to life, visually, year-round, with the inventory that
they own. I was able to show him what can be done by their volunteers, with
the church's ellipsoidals - techniques that approximate the effects we were
getting with the more expensive intelligent fixtures - but without the expense.
Part of the budget/money question often involves personnel: "We don't
have the money to hire a technical director or lighting designer."
I know that a lack of skilled staff is a very real issue for most churches,
but I'd argue that volunteers with the right mindset can do some absolutely
amazing things. A part of this is making sure that your equipment selections
don't outpace your volunteer base's capabilities. This goes a long way in
enabling a volunteer-intensive ministry to achieve excellence.
The Style Misperception
The second misperception that limits churches is along the lines of "Our
church is pretty conservative. That technology is all well and good for
'First Contemporary Church of the Amplified', but it would never fit in
here."
As to this excuse, whether your church is a "coat-and-tie" or
"blue jeans" church (or, somewhere in between), multiple technologies
and media tools can be used in a unified way to enhance the worship experience-it
is simply their specific application or emphasis that is different for each
situation. Don't write off a particular piece of equipment or a certain
concept just because someone else's application of it feels high-tech or
flashy.
Intelligent lighting technology is a great example of this. Let's say you
go to see Third Day or Kenny Chesney. At different times in the concert
you'll see bright, saturated color; dramatic, moving shafts of light; and
clearly seen, animated patterns. At other times, you might see softer, more
subtle color-or moments with little or no obvious movement and less noticeable
textures. Before you're tempted to write any of it off, ask yourself how
what you're seeing, applied differently, can enhance even a conservative
service? Is it a certain color or texture? Is it a scenic element? How can
you use the same technology, but with a slightly different outcome?
On one occasion, I was part of the team that produced a conference on creativity
in the church. Most of our lighting was fairly edgy and was created utilizing
higher-end technology. One of the sessions, however, was intentionally produced
with a less flashy, anyone-can-do-this style. We did this to demonstrate
some visuals that could be achieved using simpler resources. We were trying
to point out the concept, not the piece of equipment producing it. We were
also making a similar point to one I'm making here: just because a given
piece of equipment will do something, that does not mean that it necessarily
has to. Embracing the concepts and using technology is about tastefully
enhancing your message and your church's personality - not necessarily changing
either. Just remember, there is often a fine line between enhancing and
distracting. This line will be in different places for different churches.
My hat is off to those of you who have not let these things hinder to you. For those who have been snared by them, I hope that you've gotten a taste for how churches of differing budgets and differing styles can share a mindset, can use the same tools, can create some beautiful things. The specific methods, emphasis, and technologies used may simply be different.
Click
HERE for Part 2.
C. Andrew Dunning is a lighting designer and owner of Nashville-based Landru Design - www.landrudesign.com.